Showing posts with label future. Show all posts
Showing posts with label future. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 April 2009

Thursday, 2 April 2009

Employee Generated Content



Southwest Airlines flight attendant David Holmes has become something of a minor Internet hit after passengers posted cellphone videos of his hip-hop inspired takes on the standard cabin announcements.

Brands, esepcially in the UK, are trying more and more to distinguish themselves through their staff, who are now seen as the front line of a brand. B&Q, Asda, Sainsbury's and more all want to show their authenticity and fluffy personality, which makes perfect sense.

The disturbing thing is though someone, somewhere is now probably trying to sell this clip....

Tuesday, 3 March 2009

Thursday, 26 February 2009

The power of now



I've loved this campaign ever since I saw it last November, three months on and I've finally got hold of a widget for it. To me it is a perfect embodiment of what digital advertising is all about...

Creating pieces of accesible content that inspires users and brings a brand's DNA to life.

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

Does New Media need a different name?


Last night at one of the IPA’s ‘Club 44’ events, Laurence Green spoke about what ideas will thrive in the new media world we live in, what he thinks the new communications model looks like and what this means for agencies. Whilst it was reassuring to hear many of the things we already practice at glue it dawned on me that perhaps new media, just as New Labour before it, is slowly but surely losing its prefix.

Ten years on, consumers and advertisers alike now stare at a much-changed and fast-changing media landscape. We are constantly being told that our industry is slowly adjusting to new conditions: most obviously the emerging dominance of the web and reduced roles for TV and print. But have we not already reached the tipping point?

In Back to the Future 3 (admittedly the worst one) Doc and Marty make a scale model of their latest time bending escape route over Clayton Ravine. If advertising was placed on that model, surely we would now be past the rickety sign exclaiming ‘Point of no return’ and trying to drag the girl (clients?) along for the ride!?

A generation of consumers now exists with no knowledge of life without digital, where brands do rather than say, campaigns can exist and thrive without any traditional media budget and content is king. Creativity by its very nature continues to break or bend the rules that we write for it, I’m just wondering how long the name tag will be kept on its current formation.

Friday, 6 February 2009

Wednesday, 9 July 2008

Are great ideas dead?


The complexity of digital media often blurs the lines between "ideas" and "production," particularly as brand building moves from messages to experiences. If the experience is the fulcrum of the effort, it is hard to discount the work that goes into creating that experience as simple production. The best work often erases the distinction.

"The era of everything being based on the great idea is over," says Michael Lebowitz. "Other things have risen to a common level of importance." Without interactive experts to bring ideas to life, he adds, the big ideas are like "a fart in the wind."


"You need an army," says Michael Ferdman, managing director of Firstborn, a New York digital agency. "The idea is going to be spurred by two people, but they need to embrace all kinds of tentacles. It's like a starfish."

Wednesday, 18 June 2008

blog bites


Andrew Sullivan recently wrote a piece for The Times titled "Google is giving us pond-skater minds". In which he argues that if a typewriter took part in the forming of the thoughts of a mind as profound and powerful as Nietzsche’s, what on earth is Google now doing to us? Are we fast losing the capacity to think deeply, calmly and seriously?

Certainly the experience of reading only one good book for a while, and allowing its themes to resonate in the mind, is what we risk losing. But is this necessarily a bad thing. More information is available to more people then ever before, take Wikipedia for example, a phenomenal global project. Internet increased the sale of books, now look at Kindle.

Interestingly though, here I am giving my opinion in a short 200 word blog article, and already thinkning about my next post...more please!

Tuesday, 17 June 2008

Godcast


Ever keen to spread the bible according to glue, Mark and Seb were this months guests on Inside-online

Listen to there podcast on how to be a perfect client, being more experimental and the need for speed of ideas in current brand advertising.

http://www.redskyvision.com/inside-online/

Monday, 10 March 2008

What is the point of digital


I sometimes feel I have become un-naturally bias towards advertising and the role of digital in particular. Clearly this could be seen as a good thing, I should be excited by the work I do but I am willing to concede that it may also sometimes come across as a horrible result of industry propoganda! Even so I can't help but fall for the argument and this now means that I have a well rehearsed response to the inevitable question...

"What is the point of digital"

The Internet is not just another "media", as the Old Media insists, but mostly I think a "space", similar to the American Continent immediately after it was discovered – anything that can be found on the Web has a physical presence. It occupies real estate. To encounter a logo, a picture or an animation on the Internet is a totally different experience than to find the same stuff in a magazine or on the television. "Things" in the Internet exist in a specific location, while in magazines and on TV contents are mostly cold, passive, bullets of information. Online they constitute a body: they are parts of a new genre. They are Web Entities.

The digital world is all about experiencing things, engaging with something because it's entertaining or fulfilling or useful or all three and more. Whilst there are of course drawbacks to this argument, some sites are simply too old or cumbersome to have any impact, web 2.0 and onwards will see a huge change in how people use the net, in a way that no other media can.

Thursday, 28 February 2008

Digital Darwin


Darwin can be used as an illustration for pretty much anything...

"It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the ones most responsive to change" - Charles Darwin.


However "responsive to change" as a piece of marketing advice is probably a little thin.

In a fragmented media landscape companies must battle issues of cost, complex messaging requirements and consumers being able to edit or evade adverts. Change for change's sake or change with out direction won't get you very far, a
marketers response (no matter what the media) should really be
"will it cut through? Is it interesting or amusing? Will people talk about it?"

Constantly interrupting people with adverts just won't work.
Whilst there can't ever be a truly perfect new media cocktail, I recently came across an interesting paper by BBH's Jim Carroll who set out "10 principles for marketing in the age of engagement".

1) The first priority is engagement
2) Fame is a legitimate objective
3) Recognise the critical role of the aesthetic
4) Embrace speed and intimacy
5) Explore beyond narrative
6) Extend across platforms
7) Treat brand
messaging as content
8) A big idea holds it all together
9) Take risks
10) No sector is exempted from the principles

Monday, 18 February 2008

Wake up world


I was reading Russell Davies' post about William Gibson's line about the future and it got me thinking...

Digital is here, it's just not evenly distributed.

There is no doubt that Media Consumption has changed dramatically over the past 10 years, with the Web now a close second behind TV in terms of daily media consumption.


Yet overall, marketers invest only 7.5% of their advertising / marketing budget to online initiatives. If consumers spend 30% of their media time online, why has allocation of media budget not caught up?

McKinsey recently published a study of 410 marketing executives in retail, telecomm, technology, business services and energy. McKinsey reported that the primary barriers to online investment were:

52% insufficient metrics to measure impact,
41% Insufficient in-house capabilities,
33% Difficulty of convincing upper management,
24% Limited reach of digital tools, and
18% insufficient capabilities at agency

The leading deterrent to investing online is not a surprise as online marketing is still a relatively new, somewhat complex, and rapidly changing entity. But wake up people, Digital will continue to take share from traditional media, and marketers must adapt to the changing times. Savvy marketers will take advantage of the opportunities in online and mobile marketing; those who drag their feet are in for an uphill struggle.

The picture was taken from the excellent http://thepostitproject.blogspot.com/